Avi Dan, CEO of Avidan Strategies recently wrote a CMO Strategy article for AdAge titled, “As Shops Transform, Marketers Must Adapt Too: CMOs Must Draft a Blueprint for the New Client-Agency Relationship and Redesign Their Role.”
In the article, Mr. Dan expresses the shift in compensation from the model established at the dawn of the industry in the late 19th century to value-based agreements which base pay for performance, thereby aligning the interests of clients and agencies more closely. He mentions a number of key aspects that may be included in the new model, such as de-layering the service structure of agencies by reducing middle management; or relying more on freelance creatives and planners, this is something he calls Hollywoodization.
Mr. Dan also recommends that CMOs redesign the client’s side of the relationship as well by having marketers adapt a new set of skills and responsibilities. He primarily focuses on the skill set of the CMO and one aspect we at Jones&Bonevac especially agree with is what he calls, Process Audit and Design. The following is an excerpt from his article:
Process audit and design. With leaner agencies, single-mindedness is vital. CMOs should develop and champion a time-saving and labor-saving streamlined marketing and advertising process. You should ask yourself continuously, are assignments properly established and budgeted? Outcomes quantified, agreed to and documented? Is the approval process logical and prompt? Timetables unambiguous? During the transition, CMOs should establish a marketing and advertising process design plan to avoid operational bottlenecks.
Why we think that Mr. Dan is so spot-on will come as no surprise to those of you who regularly follow our blog. Just like Mr. Dan, we recognize the need to save time and labor by developing a process to streamline the marketing and advertising process.
We agree with the questions that he suggests to constantly be asking. While it may seem obvious that assignments should be properly budgeted, all too often the agency will go over budget as a result of unclear timetables or a lack of documented and quantified outcomes.
Mr. Dan also brought up the particularly important approval process; we suggest that one way to make it more logical and prompt is to reduce the number of decisions makers to one or two at the most. When the process clearly defines who is responsible for what and that there is little or no overlap among managers and decision makers, then the chances of success dramatically increase.
The ongoing transformation of the relationship between clients and agencies is something we at Jones&Bonevac take very seriously. We deliver multi-tiered solutions to our clients to help them quickly adapt to the challenges of the changing times. We offer training to companies seeking to give their marketers a head start in adopting these new roles and responsibilities. We provide a service as an objective third-party to review and audit our client’s communications with their agencies in order to design a more efficient and cost-saving process.
If you are interested about how your company can benefit by adopting these strategies then feel free to email info@jonesandbonevac.com, or visit our website at jonesandbonevac.com to find out more.

Great points, but one thing I have come up against time and time again while trying to get either clarity on an assignment or approval of an idea is The Fiefdom-Fraught Firm! For example, the head of marketing for a division could care less what the CMO wants and the agency gets caught in the middle. I know it’s just plain old bad management and poor organizational structure, but still, it comes up all too often. Any thoughts on how to deal with it?
This is a common problem, but is fundamental and internal to the client structure. A good idea to vet the client before taking them on?
Nigel Evans
Internet Marketing Future
Would that more agencies could do that, Nigel. Unfortunately, even if they are aware of past problems, nearly all agencies approach each new business prospect with a “we can fix them” mentality.
Jeff – We’re working on some fixes.
Casey
Human behavior won’t change as much as you want to believe it can. This type of thinking is ruining agencies.
Marty – A very interesting comment. The reality-check is welcome. We too are jaded by the misbehavior of agencies, and clients. Does that mean innovators should give up? There are examples of entire industries changing behaviors. Mostly because better tools (and/or processed) were created, a few innovators adopted them and excelled, then others followed suit until the new behavior was “standard.” Sales management is a classic example. Another compelling argument, at least for belief in potential change, is that lack of belief extinguishes effort, which eradicates even the possibility that we can improve.
Casey – what agencies are delivering on your belief?
My optimism isn’t based on the current state of agencies, Marty. It is based primarily on transformation I’ve seen in other industries and functions in very recent years. Sales was transformed by improved tools and processes. So was supply-chain management.
Three simple things that need to be firmly in place in order to find any treasure in Online Internet Marketing.
You have to know where to look for it…
You have to know what to look for…
You need the right tools to bring it to surface.
Regards,
treasurehuntreview.co.cc
Just wanted to say “thanks” for this — it really helped me out today!
Really inspiring report! Thanks!
You are welcome! Let us know if you need any further insights. info@brieflogic.com
sometimes Sales Management takes a lot of effort and skill.;~”
Sales Management is very essential in making your business succeed, every part of a business should be managed carefully.`’`